Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- potsdam2019:start [2019/12/09 20:31] – admin
+++ potsdam2019:start [2019/12/10 10:31] (current) – florian
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Slot 1: Sat 15:00-17:00 "processes in research"\\
 Slot 2: Sat 18:00-20:00 "biographies in science"\\
-Slot 3: sat 20:00-open end  "dinner and bar crawling in Potsdam"\\
+Slot 3: sat 20:00-open end  "dinner and bar visit in Potsdam"\\
 Slot 4: Sun 12:00-15:00 "arts as science, science as arts"\\
 concluding session: 15:00-16:00+
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 [[Session 2 - Biographies in Science]]
-[[Session 3 - Potsdam at Night]]
+[[Session 3 - Arts as Science, Science as Arts]]
-[[Session 4 - Arts as Science, Science as Arts]]
-Summary: \\
-We asked the at remaining people at the end of the workshop to shortly warp up, what they took from this workshop. We want to let this be the summary.
-Berna:
-  * Processes and practices in science:
-    * Further develop understanding
-    * New inspiration for already started project about arxive (WEBSITE?): \\ Who are the people behind these papers. New emphasis maybe on how did this paper evolve?
-Pedro:
-  * First BRCP meeting, very happy to meet people with a similar mind-set
-  * Likes very much the idea of including the history of the research in a publication. Also the failures, which he considers very important, would have place here.
-  * Art can be very helpful for scientific outreach. He did not think about this before in this way.
-Markus: (you can write this ;)
-Willi:
-  * new ideas for imagination of the N-dimensional space. Very inspiring!
-Philip:
-  * There are many more connection between arts and science than thought before. He sees a lot of possibilities here!
-  * Very fond of the idea of the new institute! Maybe connect arts and science from the beginning?
-  * Very grateful for the term outreach!
-  * Sees himself as a researcher because he doesn't know where his processes are going to. However, actual researchers suffer a lot from having to clear goals and not being able to let things evolve freely.
-Florian:
-  * Very interesting to see how diverse the opinions are even in such a special group like the BRCP (see factions in the first session)
-  * Strengthened in his wish to pursue more collaborations between arts and science, especially related to scientific reflection and research process
-  * The institute idea was really inspiring!
+[[Summary]]