Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- potsdam2019:start [2019/12/09 18:14] – admin
+++ potsdam2019:start [2019/12/10 10:31] (current) – florian
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Science outside Academia, BRCP Meeting Potsdam 30 Nov - 1 Dez 2019 ======
-{{ :potsdam2019:kauz_bw.jpg?300| The owl of Minerva spreads its wings to leave the grim forest of established academia. }}
+{{ :potsdam2019:kauz_bw.jpg?250| The owl of Minerva spreads its wings to leave the grim forest of established academia. }}
 In direct succession to the symposium "History in Physics: Quantum Gravity" held in Potsdam and organised by BRCP members we set up a small-scale, two-day meeting on the topic of possible pathways for pursuing research in the domain of natural sciences outside of traditional institutions. Especially the natural sciences are usually envisioned as something 'independent' and 'free', yet inquiries into these domains are practically always socially (economically, politically) conditioned. It is not our objective to 'liberate' science, but to find models that partly resolve this discrepancy by rather liberating the scientist. The focused sessions will thus include discussions about vagabond science, nomadic thinking, rhizomatic structures of knowledge, and community-based publishing.
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Slot 1: Sat 15:00-17:00 "processes in research"\\
 Slot 2: Sat 18:00-20:00 "biographies in science"\\
-Slot 3: sat 20:00-open end  "dinner and bar crawling in Potsdam"\\
+Slot 3: sat 20:00-open end  "dinner and bar visit in Potsdam"\\
 Slot 4: Sun 12:00-15:00 "arts as science, science as arts"\\
 concluding session: 15:00-16:00+
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
   - Leonard  (remote contribution from Hamburg)
   - Bernadette
-  - Pedro
   - Robin (Saturday until 7)
   - Flavio (Saturday until 5)
@@ Line 27: / Line 26: @@
 Guests:
+  - Pedro (physicist, both days, quit academia 9y ago, heard from BRCP through affiliations on two papers)
   - Maria (physicist, participant of History of Science symposium, Saturday until 5)
-  - ... (physicist?, friend of Maria, Saturday until 5)
+  - Julia (physicist, friend of Maria, Saturday until 5)
   - Mona (conceptual artist, friend of Florian, Saturday until 5)
   - Richard (from Xenorama collective, Saturday from 4 until end)
-  - Philip (free theater director, Sunday)
+  - Philip (free theatre director, Sunday)
 With this very diverse and  motivated group of people, we had an extraordinary weekend of discussions that had roughly 4 parts. Please see the according documentation in the following
-Also use for documentation.
 [[Introduction]]
@@ Line 43: / Line 41: @@
 [[Session 2 - Biographies in Science]]
-[[Session 3 - Potsdam at Night]]
+[[Session 3 - Arts as Science, Science as Arts]]
-[[Session 4 - Arts as Science, Science as Arts]]
-Summary: \\
-We asked the at remaining people at the end of the workshop to shortly warp up, what they took from this workshop. We want to let this be the summary.
-Berna:
-  * Processes and practices in science:
-    * Further develop understanding
-    * New inspiration for already started project about arxive (WEBSITE?): \\ Who are the people behind these papers. New emphasis maybe on how did this paper evolve?
-Pedro:
-  * First BRCP meeting, very happy to meet people with a similar mind-set
-  * Likes very much the idea of including the history of the research in a publication. Also the failures, which he considers very important, would have place here.
-  * Art can be very helpful for scientific outreach. He did not think about this before in this way.
-Markus: (you can write this ;)
-Willi:
-  * new ideas for imagination of the N-dimensional space. Very inspiring!
-Philip:
-  * There are many more connection between arts and science than thought before. He sees a lot of possibilities here!
-  * Very fond of the idea of the new institute! Maybe connect arts and science from the beginning?
-  * Very grateful for the term outreach!
-  * Sees himself as a researcher because he doesn't know where his processes are going to. However, actual researchers suffer a lot from having to clear goals and not being able to let things evolve freely.
-Florian:
-  * Very interesting to see how diverse the opinions are even in such a special group like the BRCP (see factions in the first session)
-  * Strengthened in his wish to pursue more collaborations between arts and science, especially related to scientific reflection and research process
-  * The institute idea was really inspiring!
+[[Summary]]