User Tools

Site Tools


hamburgminicourse2017:time-dependent_potentials

This is an old revision of the document!


Time-dependent potentials

If the Hamiltonian $H(t)=-\Delta+V(t)$ is time-dependent, the approach involving evolution semigroups has to be modified and below we give a proof for the existence of solutions to the Schrödinger equation with potential $V(t)$. An obvious restriction is $V(t) \in K$ from the class of Kato perturbations from before for all times. By the Kato–Rellich theorem this guarantees that the family $\{H(t)\}_t$ of Hamiltonians has a joint domain $D(H)=D(-\Delta)$. But it remains open what time-related restriction on the potential we have to choose to get a well-defined solution, i.e. a family of evolution operators $U(t,s)$ forming an evolution system.

Definition. The unitary operators $U(t,s), 0\leq s,t \leq T$, form a evolution system if

  1. $U(t,t) = \mathrm{id}$
  2. $U(t,r)U(r,s) = U(t,s)$
  3. $U(t,s)^{-1} = U(t,s)^* = U(s,t)$
  4. $\partial_t U(t,s) = -i H(t) U(t,s)$ and $\partial_s U(t,s) = i U(t,s) H(s)$ on $D(H)$

Note that the members of the family $\{H(t)\}_t$ are in general not commuting among each other or with the evolution operator. We use a technique called the stepwise static approximation1) that divides the time interval $[0,T]$ into short subintervals and takes $H(t)$ constant over each such subinterval, then passing to smaller and smaller subintervals. The relevant potential classes, also with regard to regularity issues later, are the following:

Definition. (“Sobolev–Kato space”) $K^m = \{ V \in K \mid \partial^{\alpha}V \in K, |\alpha|\leq m \}$ with the respective norm where multi-index notation is used for the (weak) partial derivative.

Definition. (“Sobolev–Kato–Lipschitz space”) $\mathrm{Lip}([0,T], K^m)$ with norm \[ \max_{t\in[0,T]} \|V(t)\|_{K^m} + \max_{s<t}\frac{\|V(t)-V(s)\|_{K^m}}{|t-s|}. \]

Proof sketch. We show that potentials $V \in \mathrm{Lip}([0,T], K)$ give a well defined Schrödinger solutions but the proof omits a few important steps that would take up too much space here.2)

1. Take the time interval $[0,t]$ with $t\leq T$ divided into $k$ subintervals $[t_j,t_{j+1}]$ that all decrease in length with increasing number $k$. We define the stepwise static approximation by using Stone's theorem for $k$ different static Hamiltonians: \[ U_k(t,0) = \exp(-iH(t_{k-1})(t_k-t_{k-1})) \ldots \exp(-iH(t_{0})(t_1-t_0)) =: U_k^{(k)} \ldots U_k^{(1)} \]


1) Reed M and Simon B, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness (Academic Press, 1975), Theorems X.70 and 71; based on Kato T, Integration of the equation of evolution in a Banach space, J. Math. Soc. Japan 5 208-234 (1953)
2) The full proof and many things more on the subject can be found in my PhD thesis on arXiv, §3.7.
hamburgminicourse2017/time-dependent_potentials.1491158432.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/04/02 20:40 by markus

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki