hamburgminicourse2017:classes_of_static_potentials
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| hamburgminicourse2017:classes_of_static_potentials [2017/04/02 15:33] – created markus | hamburgminicourse2017:classes_of_static_potentials [2017/04/04 09:27] (current) – markus | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| - what is the domain of such a Hamiltonian? | - what is the domain of such a Hamiltonian? | ||
| - | In the free case $V=0$ we have $D(H)=H^2(\mathbb{R^n})$ or for bounded space domains and zero boundary conditions $D(H)=H^2(\Omega)\cap H^1_0(\Omega)$. | + | In the free case $V=0$ we have $D(H)=H^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ or for bounded space domains and zero boundary conditions $D(H)=H^2(\Omega)\cap H^1_0(\Omega)$. |
| + | |||
| + | **Definition.** Let $A,B$ be densely defined operators, then $B$ is called $A$-// | ||
| + | - $D(A)\subseteq D(B)$ and | ||
| + | - there are $a,b>0$ such that for all $\varphi \in D(A)$ it holds $\|B\varphi\| \leq a\|A\varphi\| + b\|\varphi\|$. | ||
| + | The smallest such constant $a$ is called the //relative bound//. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Theorem (Kato--Rellich).** For $A$ self-adjoint, | ||
| + | |||
| + | With tools of Fourier analysis one shows that for $A=-\Delta$ this indeed holds for $B=v \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)+L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3)$, | ||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \|V\psi\|_{L^2} \leq \|V\|_K \|\psi\|_{H^2}. | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | One could ask if the Kato perturbations are the maximal class for the Kato--Rellich theorem to hold, but this is not the case. An almost maximal class is given by the so-called Stummel class potentials that are closely related to the Kato class (again something different than the Kato perturbations) of the form version of the Kato--Rellich theorem, called KLMN theorem. | ||
| + | |||
| + | >> | ||
hamburgminicourse2017/classes_of_static_potentials.1491140020.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/04/02 15:33 by markus