Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- cwf:bohmian_trajectory [2016/10/17 14:56] – markus
+++ cwf:bohmian_trajectory [2016/10/24 15:54] (current) – markus
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+====== Bohmian trajectories ======
+We define the usual probability density and current.
+\begin{align}
+\rho(t,x) &= |\Psi(t,x)|^2 \\
+j(t,x) &= \frac{\hbar}{m}\Im \{ \Psi(t,x) \nabla \Psi(t,x) \}
+\end{align}
+The well-known continuity equation can then be derived directly from the Schrödinger equation.
+\begin{equation}
+\partial_t \rho + \nabla \cdot j = 0
+\end{equation}
+Note that the symbol $\nabla$ includes partial derivatives with respect to all particle coordinates, thus $j$ is a $3N$-component vector. By analogy to fluid dynamics it is natural to introduce a probability velocity vector field by setting $j = \rho v$ that defines the flow of any given fluid element at position $x = X(t)$ in $3N$-dimensional configuration space.
+\begin{equation}
+\dot{X}(t) = v(t,X(t)) = \frac{j(t,X(t))}{\rho(t,X(t))} = \frac{\hbar}{m}\Im \left. \frac{\nabla \Psi(t,x)}{\Psi(t,x)} \right|_{x=X(t)}
+\end{equation}
+Problems with this definition clearly arise for small densities $\rho \approx 0$.
+Note that if one is only interested in the propagation of the first particle coordinates $x_1$ we are naturally led to the concept of the [[conditional wave function]] $\psi_1(t,x_1) = \Psi(t,x_1,X_2(t),X_3(t),\ldots)$.
+\begin{equation}
+\dot{X}_1(t) = \frac{\hbar}{m}\Im \left. \frac{\nabla_1 \Psi(t,x)}{\Psi(t,x)} \right|_{x=X(t)} = \frac{\hbar}{m}\Im \left. \frac{\nabla_1 \psi_1(t,x_1)}{\psi_1(t,x_1)} \right|_{x_1=X_1(t)}
+\end{equation}
+Thus knowledge of $\psi_1$ suffices for evaluation of the first particle's Bohmian trajectory.